MoThoughts
Reflections related to Futuring and Innovation on my Doctoral Journey in Cybersecurity and Information Assurance.
Wednesday, August 20, 2025
Friday, August 8, 2025
Resisting the Force and Staying the course- a Blockbuster error
...meanwhile we will stay the course
Introduction
The featured organization faced several forces that bypassed the corporation’s ability to adapt, plan and engage in futuring. In 2004 the successful corporation had a market value of 5.9 billion dollars with a strong global presence and a staff above 80,000 people (Harress, 2015).
The organization is Blockbuster.
Blockbuster, a well-known name that offered movie and video game rental services to millions of people was unable to combat, “competition from online streaming and on-demand rental sites (Harress, 2015).
Resisting the Force
The forces that influenced the downfall of Blockbuster will be taken from the STEEPLE model. This well-known strategic analytical model that lists Social, Technological, Economic, Environmental, Political, Legal and Ethical external factors. These factors or forces can influence a business’s success model (George and Creately, 2024).
Two of the external factors or forces I will focus on related to Blockbuster are the Social and Technological Elements.
Social Forces
George and Creately neatly sums up Social Factors as demographics, lifestyle transformations and evolving social values fueled by sustainability, social justice, diversity and ethical consumption (2024).
Blockbuster clients that realized that media was digitally available contributed to the trend for this form of entertainment to explode. Harress reports that Blockbuster did not change its physical rental model when digital media was in its infancy, neither did it purchase Netflix for $50 million in 2000 when an offer was made (2015), showing a lack of strategic prowess.
Technological Forces
Technological Forces are described as considerations of the innovation ecosystem, such as AI, quantum computers, biotechnology and other emerging technologies. Digital Transformation and the ability to embrace AI, IoT technologies, cybersecurity and cloud computing. Research and development which underscores Technological forces with investments, patents, identification of disruptive innovations and collaborative research ecosystems (George and Creately, 2024).
Between 2005-2007 Blockbuster made a crucial error by not embracing digital transformation. Harress states that decisions inclusive of “ditching the total access online service in favor of continuing the in-store, retail-orientated model “ (2015) proved to be a big mistake and placed the company’s technology stance behind its rivals.
Summary
Forbes reports that Blockbuster lost 75% of market value between 2003 to 2005 (2010). The company lost its shares partially due to social forces like changing entertainment values and technological forces such as the inability to explore emerging technologies, envision the future of digital transformation or understand the serious nature of disruptive innovations.
In an increasingly digitized society, survival requires constant review of forces and intelligence backed bravery to, not stay the course. Blockbuster is a perfect case study in what happens when Social and Technological forces are ignored.
References
Forbes. (2010, May 18). (A timeline: the blockbuster life cycle. https://www.forbes.com/2010/05/18/blockbuster-netflix-coinstar-markets-bankruptcy-coinstar_slide.html
George, C., & Creately. (2024, November 29). What is a STEEPLE Analysis? Understanding its Elements and How to Create One. Creately. https://creately.com/guides/steeple-analysis/
Harress, C. (2015, December 5). Blockbuster RIP: The Video-Rental Empire is Dead. International Business Times. https://www.ibtimes.com/sad-end-blockbuster-video-onetime-5-billion-company-being-liquidated-competition-online-giants
Saturday, August 2, 2025
Three states that describe Innovation Experience: Serendipity, Error & Exaptation
Serendipity, Error & Exaptation
Serendipity
Serendipitous innovations occur when people are not actively seeking a benefit or solution or actively inventing. These innovations come as a surprise to the inventor as well as to the market.
In 1938, Ruth Wakefield (part owner of the Toll House Inn in Massachusetts) decided to make cookies for expected guests. When she arrived in the kitchen she realized she did not have bakers’ chocolate and hastily decided to chop up a bar of semi-sweet chocolate and add it to her ingredients (Kabir, 2023).
The yummy result of this hasty action
turned into a worldwide sensation called Chocolate Chip Cookies. This serendipitous innovation paid off when one
year later, Ms. Wakefield allowed Nestle to use the recipe and the Toll House
brand was born (Kabir, 2023).
Error
Innovations that occur by Error are accidental in nature and are products (or services) that were meant to be a solution or benefit in other ways.
An example of this would be the popular product Post-its.
Chemist, Dr. Spencer Silver was in the process of experimenting with formulas to create stronger adhesives in 1968 (Bellis, 2019b, Skonord, 2021). This work led to the discovery of microspheres which is an adhesive substance that removes easily from surfaces (Post-it.com, n.d.). Even though the substance did not create a strong bond, Dr. Silver believed that the product could be useful and promoted it constantly (Skonord, 2021).
Several years later Art Fry- a scientist
who worked at the same company as Dr. Silver (3M), contacted Dr. Silver to
collaborate on a product which could potentially solve a problem with bookmarking.
They developed the sticky note originally known as, Press ‘n Peel and which
later became known as Post-it notes (Bellis, 2019b, Post-it.com, n.d.).
In 2024 The Post-It note market size was 200.09 Million with a CAGR of
1.07% to 2033 -for a market valued at 206.59 million (Global Market Statistics,
n.d.).
Exaptation
Of the three methods of invention being discussed Exaptation reveals itself to be the one with multiple applications. Exaptation occurs when an invention or innovation is created for one purpose but is repurposed to provide benefit or solutions in a different area.
Percy LeBaron Spencer is credited with the invention of the Microwave oven. When he discovered this invention in 1945, he was seeking a way to make a radar tool called magnetrons more efficient (Omnispear, 2024). During this process he noticed changes in the state of nearby food which would occur whenever he or his associates worked on the magnetrons. The changes in state peaked his curiosity and in 1945 after further experiments the Microwave oven was patented (Omnispear, 2024).
The Microwave
oven is an example of exaptation because it came about from work on an existing
product, the magnetrons (Andriani & Cattani, 2016).
Global Market Insights noted that in 2024 the Microwave
market was valued at 10.5 billion dollars with a CAGR of 4.6 % plus with a
market value of 16.3 billion by 2034 (Singh & Singh, 2024).
If an innovation is created or discovered intentionally, serendipitously,
by error or exaptation the development requires an atmosphere of openness, empowerment
and experimentation to grow (Skonord, 2021).
When the inventor(s) are enabled in such an atmosphere, the
possibilities become reality.
References
Andriani, P., & Cattani, G. (2016).
Exaptation as source of creativity, innovation, and diversity: Introduction to
the special section. Industrial and Corporate Change, 25(1), 115-131. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtv053
Bellis, M.
(2019b, October 16). Invention of the post-it note. ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/history-of-post-it-note-1992326
Global Market
Statistics. (n.d.). Post-it & sticky
notes market size, share | Global Research [2033]. https://www.globalmarketstatistics.com/market-reports/post-it-sticky-notes-market-10894
Kabir, S. R.
(2023, December 11). Who invented chocolate chip cookies? Story of the blissful
biscuit | history cooperative. History Cooperative. https://historycooperative.org/who-invented-chocolate-chip-cookies/
Omnispear.
(2024, February 13). Wilson Greatbatch. Engineering & science hall of fame.
https://eshalloffame.org/inductee/wilson-greatbatch/
Post-it.com
(n.d.). About us: MMM-ext. https://www.post-it.com/3M/en_US/post-it/contact-us/about-us/
Singh,
S., & Singh, A. (2024). Microwave oven Market - by product type, by
structure, by capacity, by power, by price range, by end use, by distribution
channel analysis, share, growth Forecast, 2025 to 2034. In Global Market
Insights Inc. https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/microwave-oven-market
Skonord,
C.(2021, February 19). Post-it notes: An employee idea that was originally a mistake.
Ideawake.
https://ideawake.com/post-it-notes-employee-idea-that-was-originally-mistake/
Sunday, July 27, 2025
The Cable Broadband Industry vs Streaming Services by Satellite Providers
Did Scenario Planning occur in Cable Broadband Industry related to Streaming
Services by Satellite Providers?
Introduction
On the morning of June 14th,
2025, the readers of one of the top two newspapers in The Bahamas were greeted
with the headline -Cable fears Starlink may force them out of the market
(Hartnell, 2025). The article created a
whirlwind of discussion in homes, workplaces, on radio shows, and online. ‘Everyone’
had something to say. The article’s first line stated that, “Cable Bahamas is
warning it may ‘be forced to exit the market and/or file for bankruptcy’ if
regulators fail to ensure it can compete on equal terms with Elon Musk’s
Starlink and other satellite providers” (Hartnell, 2025).
The Daily reported information from communications
which occurred with the country’s utilities regulator, Utilities Regulation and
Competition Authority, URCA (Hartnell, 2025).
The Cable provider opposed the proposed
seventy cents per megahertz spectrum fee to be levied on Starlink noting that
it was 13,000 times less than Cable Bahamas’ mobile services (Hartnell, 2025).
The provider noted that the fees were discriminatory and did not promote a
competitive industry. The sentiments
were backed by the provider’s local competitor, BTC Bahamas and noted that satellite
providers do not have the legacy community relationships or infrastructural
investments which the local providers have cultivated within the country
(Hartnell, 2025).
History Tools informs us that, “in
January 2015 SpaceX officially announced its intention to build a satellite
constellation for the purpose of providing global broadband internet
connectivity” (2024). BahamasLocal.com notes that Cable Bahamas begin
“providing cable television services in The Bahamas since March 1995, and
Internet services since March of 2000” (n.d.).
Contemplation
of a scenario planning case led Woody Wade to state that, “wasn’t the real
problem a failure of imagination on the part of the people with the responsibility…”
(Wade, p. 189, 2012).
Scenario
planning combines creative imaging of future products or services using
awareness of industry trends and innovations, present…today.
The Broadband
Cable Industry has provided television and internet access at high speeds
within global markets using a multitude of connected devices for work,
entertainment, school, research and more.
This article
contemplates how scenario-type planning would have supported the pivoting of the
Broadband Cable Industry (inclusive of fiber optic broadband) in the face of internet
streaming satellite providers and what forces are impacting the industry.
How does scenario-type planning support planning and innovation for change?
Scenario planners are to imagine what
COULD happen verses acting as if they know what WILL happen (Wade, 2012).
SpaceX
announced its intention to revolutionize the provision of broadband internet service
in 2015, yet even with this announcement Cable providers did not imagine what
COULD happen.
Engagement of
scenario planning around the 2015 announcement could have led to:
1.
Early
adoption of steaming satellite technology by some of the cable providers,
2.
Formation
of a mutually beneficial relationship with SpaceX or,
3.
Anticipatory
regulatory meetings and changes within local jurisdictions.
Scenario planning resulting in the three steps above
would have given broadband companies innovative steps towards the upcoming
change.
Monitoring and observation of forces related
to the Broadband Internet Industry shows the impact scope of changes in this
industry.
Industry Forces involved and the Impacts
“As cable TV viewership
drops, streaming has grown from 44.1% in 2021 to 53.8% in 2023” (Bouma, 2023).
The article
above highlights economic, social, technological and legal forces contributing
to changes within the Broadband Cable industry in The Bahamas. While this case highlights a recent incident
in The Bahamas, the trend is worldwide because the forces are global in
scope.
Using
the PESTLE (Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal and
Environmental) model of forces I will highlight a few which are impacting the
global Cable Industry.
Economic Impacts
Hardenbergh,
underscored that television was an intentional evolutionary product of the
Industrial Revolution and served the economic needs of corporations (2010).
Gaines (2025)
notes that while the average cable packages often exceeds $100.00 per month (I
pay $119.00 plus taxes for the most basic fiber package) persons often, “watch
only a few channels regularly which results in an average monthly cable TV bill
ranging from $114.00 to $217.00.
The Cable
model is built on access, the more you want, the more you pay. Gaines points
out a glaring point about the model which includes, cost for devices,
maintenance, connectivity fees and the fact that most people pay for channels
that they do not watch however streaming services have a lower cost between
$10.00 and $15.00 per month.
Inscape looked
at VIZIO TV and discovered that “75% of all cable and satellite customers have
cut back the amount of time they spend on cable TV. This comes as even cable subscribers are
spending more time on streaming” (Bouma, 2023). Satellite providers provide internet access to
streaming services with a wider variety of entertainment and television shows.
Daffern conducted a systematic analysis
of Starlink’s services and concludes that while the Starlink service cost may
be comparable to traditional Cable Broadband services, the factor of
differentiation appears to be in its ability to provide reliability, speed and
freedom from a heavy infrastructural network (2025).
Choosing a service provider in the
referenced industry requires payment for the services. The Economic Impacts can
relate to whether a company is exclusively conducting business solely for
self-gain or in order to provide a needed technological service to the
community while balancing financial opportunities.
Environmental and Social Impacts
In the introduction Cable Bahamas noted the community
and infrastructural investments it would have made in The Bahamas versus those
that a satellite provider will not have to make. The nature of a satellite is
that it provides streaming services without much corporate interaction with
users. Once a user or installer receives and installs the products, the process
is automated (Daffern, 2025) Service and payments are both automated, no need
for corporate interventions.
The satellite providers’ corporate
impact with users is limited -which is unfortunate because clients often like
to see positive community impacts from companies who are having financial gains
from conducting business within the community.
The positive nature of a
satellite provider’s set up is beneficial compared to the traditional hardware,
poles and lines that is required by Cable Broadband providers. The minimally invasive (if any) installation
maintains green spaces and trees. This benefit,
however, pales in comparison to what is happening in the atmosphere.
Sarnoff references a study published in Geophysical
Research Letters that found that in 2022 there was a 29.5% increase in
aluminum in the atmosphere above natural levels due to satellites reentering
the earth’s atmosphere. Concerns over potential space collisions and deorbiting
satellites are present with the rise of this new technology (2024).
Environmental and Social
Impacts will be shown in how the corporations within the industry provide
goodwill or return benefits to the communities that support the bottom line.
Returns can be financial, educational or environmental. Scenario
planning looks to the future, however if the actions taken by companies produce
negative impacts on today’s environment will there be a positive tomorrow?
Technological Impacts
Hardenbergh explores how
today’s society and culture has changed towards the television (Cable) medium
that instead of experiencing an aural and visual landscape modern users are
exposed to a multitude of aural, and visual tools, one that enables live
comments to be given (sometimes in the form of rants) blogs, websites and
social media platforms that promote
inclusive experiences (2010). These technologies also provide Zoom and other video-based
platforms that require reliable connection, high speeds and bandwidth.
Technological Impacts for industry
would be in its ability to continue to provide tools which allow users to
directly interact within the medium. Reduction of downtime and reliable
connections are features which are desired by clients (Daffern, 2025).
Conclusion
Scenario-planning for this industry would have been to respond to the announced intentions of the new satellite innovation.
An important part of
scenario planning involves monitoring proposed innovations within an industry. Woody Wade refers to this as awareness of, “the
consequences of the consequences” (Wade, p. 159, 2012). He states that one of
the ways in which scenario planning can envision what could happen is to keep a
pulse on Societal Forces. These are “arguably the most far-reaching in the long
term” (Wade, p. 159, 2012) and should be considered in the scenario plan.
Hardenbergh acknowledges
that, the environment of television is changing, not just for economic
reasons…but also because the way we are interacting with the medium is
different. We need to continue to
analyze the implications for our culture, for our ways of knowing, for
ourselves” (p. 6, 2010). It is therefore a must that scenario planners include
the possibility of cultural and societal changes when thinking of possibilities. This information to an extent can be informed
by trends, but more reliability can be envisioned by ‘seeing’ the consequences
of consequences and therefore remain grounded within the realm of possibility.
BahamasLocal.com. (n.d.). CABLE Bahamas Ltd -
Nassau - Nassau / Paradise Island, Bahamas. https://www.bahamaslocal.com/showlisting/6287/CABLE_Bahamas_Ltd.html
Bouma,
L. (2023, September 6). The death of cable TV is speeding up as cable
& satellite viewership drops to just 37.1% of all TV viewing. Cord Cutters
News. https://cordcuttersnews.com/the-death-of-cable-tv-is-speeding-up-as-cable-satellite-viewership-drops-to-just-37-1-of-all-tv-viewing/
Daffern, W. (2025, June 30). Starlink cost in 2025:
The complete guide to what you’ll really pay. Clear
Telecommunications. https://www.cleartelecommunications.com/post/starlink-cost
Gaines,
B. (2025, June 26). Is cable TV dying? (Reasons explained).
evoca.tv. https://evoca.tv/cable-tv-dying/
Hardenbergh, M. (2010). The death of
television. ETC: A review of general semantics, 67(2), 170-176.
Hartnell, N. (2025, July 14). Cable fears
starlink may force them out of market. The Tribune. https://www.tribune242.com/news/2025/jul/14/cable-fears-starlink-may-force-them-out-of-market/
History
Tools (2024, March 26). The complete history of starlink: Bringing global
internet from space. History tools. https://www.historytools.org/companies/starlink-history
Sarnoff, L. (2024, October 29). Is Musk’s starlink
polluting space? Researchers call for the FCC to pause launches. ABC News. https://abcnews.go.com/US/musks-starlink-polluting-space-researchers-call-fcc-pause/story?id=115276437
Wade, W. (2012). Scenario planning. Wiley professional,
reference & trade (Wiley K&L). https://coloradotech.vitalsource.com/books/9781118237410
Wednesday, July 9, 2025
Forecasts that became reality
MoThoughts
Planning & Forecasting I
July 9th, 2025
Forecasts that became reality
‘What may happen in the Next Hundred Years’ was an article written by John Elfreth Watkins Jr. in the December 1900 Ladies Home Journal. The article contained a descriptive list of predictions varying from technological to agricultural innovations and were given to Mr. Watkins by a cadre of interviewed contemporaries (Novak, 2020, Ladies Home Journal predictions in 1900, 2012).
This discussion will showcase three of the predictions noted in this article using the anticipated ‘predicted-by’ year of 2000. Next a look at the solutions or innovations that made this forecast a reality and finally I will mention the forces that influenced the success of the predictions.
Three of the following predictions in
this referenced article were intriguing to me.
1. “The American will be taller by from one to two
inches. His increase of stature will
result from better health, due to vast reforms in medicine, sanitation, food
and athletics. He will live fifty years
instead of thirty-five as at present…” (Novak, 2020).
2. “Man will see around the world. Persons and things of
all kinds will be brought within focus of cameras connected electrically with
screens at opposite ends of circuits, thousands of miles at a span” (Novak,
2020).
3. “Photographs will be telegraphed from any distance. If
there be a battle in China a hundred years hence snapshots for its most
striking events will be published in the newspapers an hour later…Photographs
will reproduce all of Nature’s colors” (Novak, 2020).
Picture Perfect: The Evolution of the Camera
Tangible solutions to predictions
Looking back from 2025 these three predictions
among several others in this article would have become true by the year 2000.
1. In 1900 the average height of American men was 66.9
inches and women 62.5 inches (Our World in Data, n.d.). In 2000 the average
height of American men- 69 inches and women- 64 inches (Ogden, 2004). Roser et.
al., confirms that nutritional deficiencies and illness in childhood limits
human growth, this links this prediction to the medicine, sanitation and food
factors mentioned in the year 1900 statement. In 2000 the life expectancy was 76.9
years (Arias, 2002) This prediction came true.
2. Beating the year 2000 deadline was the monitoring
camera set up in the Trojan room at University of Cambridge in 1993. Kesby (2012)
recalls how Dr. Stafford-Fraser and Dr. Jardetsky set up a camera to monitor a
coffee pot to ensure that they had a drink when going on research breaks. In November 1993 Dr. Johnson wrote the script
around that code. This action allowed computer enthusiasts from all over the
world to watch a coffee pot go from full to mid-level to empty. This was the
first time man ‘saw pictures’ around the world. This prediction came true.
3. In the 1500s cameras were being used as drawing aids,
throughout the following centuries a
long complicated story involving a major
struggle to find an efficient method to create a chemically stable photograph
and one that held colors ensued. As early as 1907 the photography industry saw
the advent of a near stable camera -The Autochrome camera. This remained the basic design until the
innovations of the1930s, which saw the invention of color films (Tom Patton,
2020). By November 1993 photographs were
able to be broadcast around the world.
This prediction came true.
Contributing forces impacting predictions
This fascinating post held several predictions which we commonly enjoy in 2025 and several that came true by 2000, - the predicted-by date. Primary forces contributing to the three cases above were, Cultural, Technological, Material Innovations, Environmental, Social and Medical Innovations.
The average height of Americans was the result of cultural, social, environmental and medical innovations. Without the social and cultural acceptance of medical innovations and improvements to the medical environment, infancy and prenatal health improvements would not have contributed to the increased height of Americans.
The advent of the Internet and Digital photography brought the ability to allow cameras to ‘see’ and transmit photos globally in near real time and with accuracy. The last two predictions were heavily influenced by technological, material innovations, social and even cultural forces (Larkin, 2022, Jenkins, 2024).
References
Arias, E. (2002, December 19). United States
Life Tables, 2000. CDC. National vital statistics reports. Vol 51, No 3. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr51/nvsr51_03.pdf
Jenkins, P. (2024, April 6). 1930s Camera Evolution: A snapshot of
vintage photography advances. Brilliantio. https://brilliantio.com/1930s-camera/
Kesby, R. (2012, November 22). How the world’s first webcam made a
coffee pot famous. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-20439301
Ladies Home Journal predictions in 1900. (2012, January 17). Couriermail. https://www.couriermail.com.au/ipad/ladies-home-journal-predictions-in-1900/news-story/c1d49ed5ee4c80457b24b06b050e1f6d
Larkin, B. (2022, July 25). 30 predictions in
history that came true. Best Life. https://bestlifeonline.com/historical-predictions/
Novak, M. (2020, January 6). What may happen
in the next hundred years. Ladies Home Journal, 1900 Paleofuture. https://paleofuture.com/blog/2007/4/17/what-may-happen-in-the-next-hundred-years-ladies-home-journa.html
Ogden, C., Fryar, C., Carroll, M., Flegal, K.
(2004). Mean body weight, height, and body mass index, United States, 1960-2002.
CDC. Advance data from vital and health statistics. No. 347, 1-18. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ad/ad347.pdf
Our World in Data. (n.d.). Average height of
women by year of birth. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/average-height-of-women?tab=line&country=~USA&mapSelect=~USA
Picture Perfect (2019, June 24,): The
Evolution of the camera [Digital image]. https://cdn.statcdn.com/Infographic/images/normal/18488.jpeg
Roser, M., Appel, C., &
Ritchie, H. (2021, May 1). Human height. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/human-height
Tom Patton. (2020, May 30).
19 In Color - A brief history of color photography [Video]. YouTube.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TR3rSXGKM4s
Planning & Forecasting
MoThoughts
Planning &
Forecasting
July 9th, 2025
Introduction
Traditional forecasting analyzed historical data and trends to create predictive models of the future. Scenario Planning is an exploration tool that looks at forces affecting a business organization’s marketing environment (ICEF, 2021b). Scenario Planning uses current data to extrapolate possible futures of opportunity, threats and possible innovation (ICEF, 2021b).
The discussion below is predominantly based on videos from Woody Wade’s, lecture at GLOBIS Insights and Oliver Baxter’s TEDx Talks and looks at both concepts from the benefits of Scenario Planning.
Scenario Planning vs Traditional
Forecasting
In the TEDx video, The future of Work
and Place, Oliver Baxter refers to Scenario planning as Futuring. He describes
it as a relatively new concept that requires investing in existing fields to
expand its growth in the future (TEDx Talks, 2019). Mr. Baxter notes that this
process includes rethinking our reality’s perspective in order to unveil
creativity and untapped resourcefulness (TEDx Talks, 2019).
This unveiling process requires sticking
to three points (taking a long realistic view, using outside thinking and
collaborating with experts from multiple disciplines or perspectives) while
using the STEEP principle (sociological, technological, economic, environmental
or political) to address and identify forces (TEDx Talks, 2019).
Mr.
Baxter noted four areas of comparison and contrast between scenario planning
and traditional forecasting as follows,
1. Scenario planning is differentiated from traditional
forecasting by moving from imagining and creating actionable insights to
viewing current trends that link together based on the identified forces (TEDx
Talks, 2019).
2. Scenario planning sees the workplace as being more contractual
and with shorten work almost projectized timelines with environments redesigned
for flexible movement based on current corporate objectives (TEDx Talks, 2019).
3. Traditional forecasting generally ‘looked’ very far
into the future which had the result of producing unconcern for those involved
in the process. Scenario Planning views a shorter – i.e. 6 year- time span that
contributors could envision themselves participating in (TEDx Talks, 2019) and
therefore invokes a sense of inclusivity.
4. Traditional forecasting generally started with a narrow
scope, focusing on the company or the company- based objectives or
challenges. Scenario Planning identified
outside forces by looking at wider perspectives and trends and narrowing those
down to see how they could possibly influence the organization (TEDx Talks,
2019).
5. The wider scope of scenario planning demands a larger
team to be consulted using experts from different industries or companies,
whereas in traditional forecasting the groups were prone to homogeneity.
The Globis Insights lecture conducted by
Mr. Woody Wade covered similar points when looking at scenario planning and
traditional forecasting. Mr. Wade cautioned that business people live for the
future and must realize that the future is constantly changing, this change
necessitates a state of readiness that is best conducted by the new concept of
scenario planning (GLOBIS Insights, 2023). Mr. Wade further notes that scenario
planning is a tool that provides organizations an opportunity to come up
with a structured and logical approach because it asks what landscapes could
look like in the future.
This process
requires exploratory visualizations of alternative futures and not predictive
statements. Mr. Wade recommended using
PEST model/ principle (political, economic, societal and technological) forces that
would impact trends or future development (GLOBIS Insights, 2023, ICEF, 2021b).
Two areas of
comparison and contrast between scenario planning and traditional forecasting
highlighted by Mr. Wade are,
1. Scenario planning is a multi-stage procedure that seeks
to focus trends or driving forces down to critical uncertainties (GLOBIS Insights, 2023, ICEF, 2021b). This
has the advantage of pooling resources towards future trends with the largest
potential impact.
2. Traditional forecasts viewed
the future in a linear projection model based on historical occurrences.
Scenario planning uses critical uncertainties to focus on structured quadrants/
matrices which allocate the advantages or disadvantages stemming from the
uncertainty.
Conclusion
Scenario planning is also described as
“multiple alternate futures in which decisions may play out” (Ogilvy, 2022). He
recommends sticking with four scenario perspectives and conducting a detailed eight
step process which involved choosing points to explore and tell a story. Like
Wade, Ogilvy uses structured matrices to look at critical uncertainties which
can be used to develop a strategic position.
Ogilvy notes that there are many ways to
conduct scenario planning (2022). Wade
and Baxter demonstrate two ways of using scenario planning which utilizes models
to identify forces which impact potential futures.
References
GLOBIS
Insights. (2023, July 28). Scenario Planning: Thinking Differently
about Future Innovation [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-CccEPJJ7k
ICEF.
(2021b, January 27). Beyond forecasting: how to use scenario planning
to map the future. ICEF Monitor - Market Intelligence for International
Student Recruitment. https://monitor.icef.com/2014/02/beyond-forecasting-how-to-use-scenario-planning-to-map-the-future
Ogilvy,
J. (2022, April 14). Stratfor: Scenario planning and strategic forecasting.
Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/stratfor/2015/01/08/scenario-planning-and-strategic-forecasting/
TEDx Talks.
(2019, June 21). Scenario planning - the future of work and place |
Oliver Baxter | TEDxALC [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAFGRGm2WxY